World of Warcraft
Moderator: Q12321
-
- |*Whoa-Thug*|
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:52 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Digity is extremely correct. =o
MMORPGs: Cost more money than other games and are more time consuming (generally speaking)
I thought 2005 would already know that.
Oh, and 2005, do you have any written reference of Blizzard saying WoW won't be as time consuming as other games?
Q stop saying it sucks lol have you ever even played it? This game deserves to be GOTY =O
MMORPGs: Cost more money than other games and are more time consuming (generally speaking)
I thought 2005 would already know that.
Oh, and 2005, do you have any written reference of Blizzard saying WoW won't be as time consuming as other games?
Q stop saying it sucks lol have you ever even played it? This game deserves to be GOTY =O
Well when it boils right down to it, somewhere along the line blizzard stated this game would be one where users wouldnt have to spend tons of time to enjoy the game. I dont know about you guys but being owned by every other 5 year old in the world who have lvl 60 chars after a month isnt fun. Nor is not being able to afford half decent gear.
Its a little unrealistic for me to spend 4 hours each and ever day for 30 days and get no where... espically when blizzard said this game would be better about that.
When you look back at thier Diablo 2, I could get a character to lvl 85 doing hell baal runs in less then 10 days, I found an enigma as soon as the latter reset... like two weeks after on my second char i found all the runes i needed and got a 3 socketd archon plate.
Its a little unrealistic for me to spend 4 hours each and ever day for 30 days and get no where... espically when blizzard said this game would be better about that.
When you look back at thier Diablo 2, I could get a character to lvl 85 doing hell baal runs in less then 10 days, I found an enigma as soon as the latter reset... like two weeks after on my second char i found all the runes i needed and got a 3 socketd archon plate.