Spyware/Adware Removal & What's up with this???

Message

#31 Post by **palmboy5** » Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:05 pm

LOL no firewall

Guest · #32 Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:25 pm

lol which 1 do u hav dawg

oh and they say windows firewall causes more problems than it solves

Antix · #33 Post by **Antix** » Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:19 pm

Are any of those Spyware/Adware apps real-time apps? Kinda like scans a file like Norton does when you DL it and tells you if there's a virus.

#34 Post by **palmboy5** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 12:05 am

i should use sygate but i use zonealarm... and SP2 firewall >< (at least for laptop anyway)

Guest · #35 Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:49 am

ZoneAlarm inteferes with DC++

2005 · #36 Post by **2005** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:18 pm

the linksus does count you ass monger.... its a NAT fireware which is much better then any software firewall you can buy, this is the reason you need to forward ports on DC++... the nat firewall refuses the connections

#37 Post by **palmboy5** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:13 pm

.... NAT basicly makes youre IP invisible, so hackers wont detect u scanning IPs. if they do know it, NATs are as useful as dragon being a female prostitute

Guest · #38 Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:11 pm

philp · #39 Post by **philp** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:22 pm

I7Iz490N wrote:Are you just supporting Linux to act smart?

I've never been one to support a losing cause, noble though it may be. Linux will never have the users MS has. It's just too late in the game.

And, unlike some, I don't have to act smart.

Guest · #40 Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:04 pm

lol thats true

#41 Post by **palmboy5** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:47 pm

im sure if linux became mass used, it would have alot of problems as well

Guest · #42 Post by **Guest** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:25 pm

yeeeeeeeeeep but since it's open source not as much

or even MORE lol

philp · #43 Post by **philp** » Sat Sep 11, 2004 7:56 am

I7Iz490N wrote:or even MORE lol

Definitely more.

Open source to a hacker is like having the combination written on the safe to a safecracker.

#44 Post by **palmboy5** » Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:05 am

it can still be uncrackable... theyd have to like.. edit the code to make a hole. but how do they do that if there is no beginning hole?

Guest · #45 Post by **Guest** » Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:22 am

LOL PALM