Page 2 of 6
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:25 pm
by 2005
My computer suck really...
HP Pavilion 533w
Intel Celeron 2.0 ghz ( running at 1.99 ghz)
512 Mb of ram ( dont know maker but bought it at crucial.com)
a combination dvd/cdwriter 16x4x42
windows xp home edition (service pack 1)
52.2 gig primary hard drive
5.01 seconday hard drive
ati radeon 9200 256 mb
soon to come:
NEC ND2510A DVD +/-rw 8x4x12 and 32x16x40 cdrw
Fantom Titanium 160GB Ext Hard Drive
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:53 pm
by Guest
LOL your ram is Crucial than ya foo
NICE HDD!
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:59 pm
by 2005
see heres the wonderful thing about the dvd burner, i can make immages of any disks and then burn to a dvd using nero and mount them with either alcohols or daemons virtual drives to run disks (about 8 actually on one disk).
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:19 am
by Guest
okay dawg
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:17 pm
by mannyace
i dunno why im so late to post... dunno brands of sum stuff like ram cuz HP built it and im too lazy to look it up
win xp mce 04
Intel P4 550 HT (3.4 GHz)
1 GB DDR RAM (2x512 DIMM)
250 GB 7200 RPM SATA HD
8X DVD+RW/+R
16x DVD-ROM
Envision 19inch flat screen crt (its old so i don kno the model)
256MB DDR ATI Radeon X600 Pro
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
KLIPSCH Promedia 2.1 Speakers/Subwoofer 200 W
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:18 pm
by Guest
Nice.
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:56 pm
by palmboy5
im loving the model numbers
(CPU)
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:13 pm
by Guest
Palm, how much better is his CPU than mine?
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:29 pm
by palmboy5
399MHz
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:31 pm
by Guest
Oh. LOL. I thought it also had more cache or something.
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:31 pm
by palmboy5
and cache helps in what WE do because....?
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 2:39 pm
by Guest
Um isnt that one of the only advantages the bartons have over others?
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:03 pm
by palmboy5
its all BS. just like QuantiSpeed. what a load of shit ROFL
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:04 pm
by Guest
Would there be a huge difference between:
A 1700+ OC'ed to 2500+ speeds vs. a 2500+ @ stock?
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:05 pm
by palmboy5
id say the same.