Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:08 am
LOL
what about how IE is integrated?? of course the process looks smaller. and that way, if IE has holes, windows has holes.Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:41 am
what about how IE is integrated?? of course the process looks smaller. and that way, if IE has holes, windows has holes.Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:27 pm
The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.philp wrote:Nah. I used FF at work when the boss made every one change. It was slow and clunky and we all had to switch back to IE for productivity reasons. Now he's trying to figure out how to convert his system to Linux.2005 wrote:It seems phill is opinionated twoards microsoft so i can see theres no point in debateing any further (I base that on the fact he singled out the only entry on that online dictionary that was pro IE).
And the reason I quoted #12 was because it was the only one that wasn't trying to be a joke.
Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one and they all stink.
And exactly how old are you.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:59 pm
IE tends to load faster, as in clicking on the E. but its not a fair comparison with the whole integration shit.... clearing cookies has nothing to do with clearing cache2005 wrote:The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.philp wrote:Nah. I used FF at work when the boss made every one change. It was slow and clunky and we all had to switch back to IE for productivity reasons. Now he's trying to figure out how to convert his system to Linux.2005 wrote:It seems phill is opinionated twoards microsoft so i can see theres no point in debateing any further (I base that on the fact he singled out the only entry on that online dictionary that was pro IE).
And the reason I quoted #12 was because it was the only one that wasn't trying to be a joke.
Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one and they all stink.
And exactly how old are you.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:26 pm
2005 wrote:The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.
We tried it for 3 weeks and it got steadily worse. And there are some cookies I need to keep.
2005 wrote:And exactly how old are you.
If that's a question, should it not end with a question mark?
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:39 pm
Yes it should but i was seriously curious as to your age??? I thought you were younger then me.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:48 pm
2005 wrote:I thought you were younger then me.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:51 pm
Haha..
2005, I presume you're either turning eighteen soon, or you already have? Palm has to be fifteen or so, same with Dragon. Q, I'm not too sure about, and phillip I believe is in his twenties.
Am I right?
2005, I presume you're either turning eighteen soon, or you already have? Palm has to be fifteen or so, same with Dragon. Q, I'm not too sure about, and phillip I believe is in his twenties.
Am I right?
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:03 pm
Than, not then.2005 wrote:Yes it should but i was seriously curious as to your age??? I thought you were younger then me.
And, assuming your SN implies you're graduating high school this year, I am not younger than you. But my age is irrelevant.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:13 pm
im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:15 pm
Dragon, obviously, but I would have thought was older. He definitely acts older.palmboy5 wrote:im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:18 pm
o.O DRAGON ACTS OLDER?!?!?1 OMG.... DRAGON LOOKIE LOOKIE AT THE MAD MAN!!
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:21 pm
That sentence doesn't even make any god damn sense.philp wrote:Dragon, obviously, but I would have thought was older. He definitely acts older.palmboy5 wrote:im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:22 pm
damn i should have thought of that lmaophilp wrote:And, assuming your SN implies you're graduating high school this year,
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:58 pm
I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic. 
Well, I think philp is unwilling to share his age, which is completely okay. Anybody want to say? For the record, I'm seventeen since January Seventeenth.
Well, I think philp is unwilling to share his age, which is completely okay. Anybody want to say? For the record, I'm seventeen since January Seventeenth.