Page 1 of 1
lol
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:59 pm
by I7Iz490N
lol
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:29 pm
by palmboy5
Tweak Test:
1) DGL-4100 (DLINK) but first through a BEFSR41 rev. 2 (Linksys)
http://www.dslreports.com/tweakr/block: ... via=normal
2) DGL-4100 (DLINK)
http://www.dslreports.com/tweakr/block: ... via=normal
dude how come you are pingable? Isn't that complete and utterly bad in terms of security?
Speed Test:
1) DGL-4100 (DLINK) but first through a BEFSR41 rev. 2 (Linksys)
http://support.shaw.ca/troubleshooting/speedtest2.htm
I have no idea where I should record the speed at, Comcast uses a burst method so my speed goes down after a few seconds, but it kept going.. and going, at about the end of the 20MB, it was at 511KB/s from 858KB/s or something. Advertised is 6000mbps, 750KB/s
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:53 pm
by I7Iz490N
lol
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:49 pm
by palmboy5
Being pingable allows hackers and hacking bots to find you when they scan through IP addresses, the way to avoid these guys is to not respond, to pretend you don't exist.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:56 pm
by Directive
My router is set to know the differance between them so it allows Ping requests.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:40 pm
by palmboy5
How well can a router tell whats good and bad? Theres always a way around something, the router would have to be kept up-to-date constantly for such a function to be useful.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:32 pm
by victimizati0n
I7Iz490N wrote:What's so unsafe about being pingable?
The reason I am pingable is so that when I play Warcraft III on BattleNet, people will know that I do not lag.
who cares if people know if you lag or not
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:01 am
by I7Iz490N
lol
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:17 pm
by palmboy5
What router? Doesn't it suck that your first tweak tests aren't even saved anymore?