Bandwidth Place 2

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:16 pm**

http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments. ... ndex=28283

as expected and discussed.... but now its hitting the media a lot more? mmm this may hurt XD

Posted: **Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:50 pm**

So......just as I've said all along; hackers will find a way into any popular system? What a surprise.

Posted: **Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:46 am**

Thats complete garbage, what percentage of the M$ users use Microsoft Windows Server 2003 ??????????????????????????

Less then 5 im willing to bet. The majority use XP (Home or Pro) and behind that is probably the last of the 98SE users (which i think still outnumber the "server 2003" users.

Thats like me inventing a new os, never releasing it to anyone and conducting a test aginst a competeing os and saying o look mines not as vunerable.

Posted: **Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:29 am**

... now now im sure its just XP Home/Pro with more admin features.... like media center was just home/pro with an added program.

Posted: **Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:59 am**

Actually, '05, I have Windows 2k Professional on my computer.

This is pretty ghey, though. The thing with Open Source is that you can fix a problem when you've found it. But, somewhere I read (on a sheet of paper printed from a website that tracks holes in major operating systems), I think that Linux is less secure than Windows, and the MAC OS is much more secure than any, even BSD.

Posted: **Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:42 pm**

Thats a home OS not a server OS

Posted: **Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:51 pm**

*imagines a mac server*

Posted: **Tue Feb 22, 2005 5:26 pm**

Hey, they do exist.

Posted: **Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:22 pm**

OMG ROFL O_O XD

Bandwidth Place 2

Linux fan concedes Microsoft is more secure

Linux fan concedes Microsoft is more secure