Bandwidth Place 2

Posted: **Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:39 pm**

http://forums.amd.com/index.php?s=&show ... t&p=662457

#     Name              CPU Model    MHz     Ram Setup    Amount      Score(MT On)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001. trickson           Opteron 170  2750    2-2-2-5-1T   2x512       1346
002. NutCase (dry ice)  P4D 940      5528    4-3-3-4        n/a       1231
003. likwidkool         X2 4200+     2805    3-3-2-7-1T   2x1GB       1186
004. Ronin              X2 4200+     2200    2-2-2-5-1T   2x512       1117
005. Logan[TeamX]       Opteron 170  2500    2-3-3-6-1T   2x512       1085
006. palmboy5           X2 3800+     2500    3-4-4-8-1T   2x1GB       1057
007. DadeMurphy         X2 3800+     2400    2.5-3-3-7-1T 2x512       1052
008. Anonymous_         Opteron 170  2800    2-3-2-6-1T   1x512       1046
009. Ronin              X2 4600+     2400    3-3-3-8-1T   2x1GB       1045
010. EdG                X2 4200+     2200    2-3-3-8-1T   2x512       1021
011. Bluekkis           X2 3800+     2000    2.5-3-3-6-1T 2x1GB       0831
012. n_w95482           CoreDuoT2400 1828    4-4-4-12     2x512       0810
013. Ronin              P4D 830      3000    5-5-5-15     2x1GB       0690
014. neilaydlett        P4D 830      2992    4-4-4-11     2x512       0690

lol at #1 and 2

Posted: **Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:19 am**

A 170 @ 2.7 ???

I so hope to god I get a good stepping and week on my 165. People have been getting 2.8-3.0 on air or slight air upgrades. If I get a good stepping/week I can get 3.0ghz on each core with that freezer 64 PRO and pwn them all... Nutcase would be the only competition

Posted: **Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:45 pm**

psh i dont believe stepping matters.. its just wishful thinking, just like "burning in". each time they make a stepping it still has chips that can only hit lower speeds, which are the unfortunate ones to be made into like.. A64 3000+ n' shit.. every week, every stepping has its good and bad chips, no one group is unified as a "good" stepping

Posted: **Mon Apr 10, 2006 7:05 pm**

As a whole people have reported better OC's on certaint steppings of the 165 by 200mhz on average.

Posted: **Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:41 pm**

so what stepping are they? i do remember something like CABNE vs CAB2E or something, the one with '2' being worse.. but from what i read its due to AMD implementing some limitations or something o.O oh well maybe there is a difference but not because of differentials in production quality

Posted: **Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:46 pm**

With the opterons... the CBBWE or CBBW1 are the on die mem controller revisions.

CBBWE being slightly less OCable compared to the CBBW1, but as we've already discussed.. Ill probably get a WE lmao.

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:02 am**

lol at least that way you wont be able to OC it beyond mine >< once i get the freezer

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:26 am**

I probably will... I should still be able to hit 2.7 stable and I dont think a 3800+ is going to hit that with anything short of phase change. And even if we both are at the same clocks, the opteron has double the on chip cache.

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:13 pm**

phase change??
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... i=2650&p=5

Manchester core @ 2.7GHz with an XP-90, may be very very hot but then the 64 is better than 90..

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:38 pm**

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:34 pm**

72C is WAY to hot... anything over 50C would be too hot IMHO.

Posted: **Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:35 pm**

Preslers run 4.2ghz on air easily, the only thing holding them back being heat. Cooling with dry ice is what makes the 5.2ghz possible.

Disabling the L1 and L2 caches can get you 6.2ghz + on preslers

Bandwidth Place 2

pwned

pwned