http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments. ... ndex=28283
as expected and discussed.... but now its hitting the media a lot more? mmm this may hurt XD
Linux fan concedes Microsoft is more secure
Moderator: victimizati0n
Linux fan concedes Microsoft is more secure
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Thats complete garbage, what percentage of the M$ users use Microsoft Windows Server 2003 ??????????????????????????
Less then 5 im willing to bet. The majority use XP (Home or Pro) and behind that is probably the last of the 98SE users (which i think still outnumber the "server 2003" users.
Thats like me inventing a new os, never releasing it to anyone and conducting a test aginst a competeing os and saying o look mines not as vunerable.
Less then 5 im willing to bet. The majority use XP (Home or Pro) and behind that is probably the last of the 98SE users (which i think still outnumber the "server 2003" users.
Thats like me inventing a new os, never releasing it to anyone and conducting a test aginst a competeing os and saying o look mines not as vunerable.
Actually, '05, I have Windows 2k Professional on my computer.
This is pretty ghey, though. The thing with Open Source is that you can fix a problem when you've found it. But, somewhere I read (on a sheet of paper printed from a website that tracks holes in major operating systems), I think that Linux is less secure than Windows, and the MAC OS is much more secure than any, even BSD.
This is pretty ghey, though. The thing with Open Source is that you can fix a problem when you've found it. But, somewhere I read (on a sheet of paper printed from a website that tracks holes in major operating systems), I think that Linux is less secure than Windows, and the MAC OS is much more secure than any, even BSD.