This'll break your Firefox using hearts

Message

Guest · #31 Post by **Guest** » Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:08 am

#32 Post by **palmboy5** » Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:41 am

what about how IE is integrated?? of course the process looks smaller. and that way, if IE has holes, windows has holes.

2005 · #33 Post by **2005** » Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:27 pm

philp wrote:
2005 wrote:It seems phill is opinionated twoards microsoft so i can see theres no point in debateing any further (I base that on the fact he singled out the only entry on that online dictionary that was pro IE).
Nah. I used FF at work when the boss made every one change. It was slow and clunky and we all had to switch back to IE for productivity reasons. Now he's trying to figure out how to convert his system to Linux.

And the reason I quoted #12 was because it was the only one that wasn't trying to be a joke.

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one and they all stink.

The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.

And exactly how old are you.

#34 Post by **palmboy5** » Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:59 pm

2005 wrote:
philp wrote:
2005 wrote:It seems phill is opinionated twoards microsoft so i can see theres no point in debateing any further (I base that on the fact he singled out the only entry on that online dictionary that was pro IE).
Nah. I used FF at work when the boss made every one change. It was slow and clunky and we all had to switch back to IE for productivity reasons. Now he's trying to figure out how to convert his system to Linux.

And the reason I quoted #12 was because it was the only one that wasn't trying to be a joke.

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one and they all stink.
The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.

And exactly how old are you.

IE tends to load faster, as in clicking on the E. but its not a fair comparison with the whole integration shit.... clearing cookies has nothing to do with clearing cache

philp · #35 Post by **philp** » Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:26 pm

2005 wrote:The only thing slow and clunky about it is the first time you go to a site, it does take along time but after its alot better unless you clear your cookies very often.

We tried it for 3 weeks and it got steadily worse. And there are some cookies I need to keep.

2005 wrote:And exactly how old are you.

If that's a question, should it not end with a question mark?

2005 · #36 Post by **2005** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:39 pm

Yes it should but i was seriously curious as to your age??? I thought you were younger then me.

#37 Post by **palmboy5** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:48 pm

2005 wrote:I thought you were younger then me.

neuralmop · #38 Post by **neuralmop** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:51 pm

Haha..

2005, I presume you're either turning eighteen soon, or you already have? Palm has to be fifteen or so, same with Dragon. Q, I'm not too sure about, and phillip I believe is in his twenties.

Am I right?

philp · #39 Post by **philp** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:03 pm

2005 wrote:Yes it should but i was seriously curious as to your age??? I thought you were younger then me.

Than, not then.

And, assuming your SN implies you're graduating high school this year, I am not younger than you. But my age is irrelevant.

#40 Post by **palmboy5** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:13 pm

im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD

philp · #41 Post by **philp** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:15 pm

palmboy5 wrote:im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD

Dragon, obviously, but I would have thought was older. He definitely acts older.

#42 Post by **palmboy5** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:18 pm

o.O DRAGON ACTS OLDER?!?!?1 OMG.... DRAGON LOOKIE LOOKIE AT THE MAD MAN!!

Guest · #43 Post by **Guest** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:21 pm

philp wrote:
palmboy5 wrote:im 16, dragon and Q are definently younger.... thats all i know XD
Dragon, obviously, but I would have thought was older. He definitely acts older.

That sentence doesn't even make any god damn sense.

Guest · #44 Post by **Guest** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:22 pm

philp wrote:And, assuming your SN implies you're graduating high school this year,

damn i should have thought of that lmao

neuralmop · #45 Post by **neuralmop** » Fri Feb 25, 2005 6:58 pm

I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic.

Well, I think philp is unwilling to share his age, which is completely okay. Anybody want to say? For the record, I'm seventeen since January Seventeenth.