3dMarks06 Scores

Message

Q12321 · #1 Post by **Q12321** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:57 pm

C'mon bitches, show off your machines.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=108771

That's my highest so far. I'll get it higher, no prob.

I7Iz490N · #2 Post by **I7Iz490N** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:40 pm

#3 Post by **palmboy5** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:00 pm

ok lemem download 06, i thought free version doesnt give you a score...?

2005 · #4 Post by **2005** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:01 pm

Ill get back to you in about 8-10 weeks

I7Iz490N · #5 Post by **I7Iz490N** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:02 pm

#6 Post by **palmboy5** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:05 pm

good lord man, Q12321, what download speed did you have? im using Guru 3D and the speed is like 212KB/s, i think ill go away and do a buncha hw first

#7 Post by **palmboy5** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:09 pm

default res is 1280x1024? hm. well anyway, im thinking this thread should be in Hardware. it may be a software but its entire purpose is to examine hardware..? what do you guys think?

EDIT:
Q, whats with the ultra low CPU OC

I7Iz490N · #8 Post by **I7Iz490N** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:31 pm

I7Iz490N · #9 Post by **I7Iz490N** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:31 pm

I7Iz490N · #10 Post by **I7Iz490N** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:31 pm

#11 Post by **palmboy5** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:48 pm

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=109023

you have been surpassed, but this is why i didnt test 3dmark till now, its not like aquamark, which tests your entire system, the only thing that majorly affects this one's score is the video card. my cards clocked lower but i guess the CPU helped a little there anyway.

Q12321 · #12 Post by **Q12321** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:58 am

palmboy5 wrote:default res is 1280x1024? hm. well anyway, im thinking this thread should be in Hardware. it may be a software but its entire purpose is to examine hardware..? what do you guys think?

EDIT:
Q, whats with the ultra low CPU OC

I haven't really seen how high it will go yet, but 2100 was running faster than 2150-2250, even though the temps were fine.

#13 Post by **palmboy5** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:28 pm

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=27577

how the FUCK? ... unless thats SLI.

Q12321 · #14 Post by **Q12321** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:24 pm

It might be... damn.

Anyone know why OCing my processor makes it slower?

2005 · #15 Post by **2005** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:59 pm

Can make a few guesses, but only a few.

The chip may be a defective one and gets unstable at those OC's.

Your ram might not be able to handel the FSB increase (if your mobo doesnt have a ram divider).