2005 7.1MP $400 Canon vs 2008 8.1MP $100 Nikon

For everything else.

Moderator: victimizati0n

Post Reply
Message
Author
palmboy5
Site Administrator
Posts: 7477
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

2005 7.1MP $400 Canon vs 2008 8.1MP $100 Nikon

#1 Post by palmboy5 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:47 pm

I'm pretty sure none of you care but I'm posting anyway.
Comparison pictures between p6_ (Nikon P60) and sd_ (Canon SD500)

http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6window1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdwindow1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6sky1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdsky1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6sky2.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdsky2.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6bbq1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdbbq1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6bbqzoom1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdbbqzoom1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6bench1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdbench1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6bushes1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdbushes1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6flower1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdflower1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6flower2.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdflower2.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6wood1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdwood1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd1sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd1sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd2sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd2sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd4sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd4sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd8sec.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd50 ... rd8sec.jpg

Nikon P60 < Canon SD500
Last edited by palmboy5 on Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Image
Top
Directive
Posts: 918
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:36 am
Location: Upstate NY

#2 Post by Directive » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:30 pm

*puts fingers in ears and shuts eyes* I'M NOT LOOKIN, LALALALALALALA!
This is only my opinion, I could be wrong.
Motherboard - ASUS S500TD Chipset Intel® B660
Procesor - 12th Gen Intel Core i5-12400 2.50 GHz(18M Cache, up to 4.4 GHz, 6 cores)
Ram - PNY 2x8GB (16GB total) DDR4 -1600 MHz
Video card - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050Ti - Base Clock 1290MHz, Boost Clock 1392MHz, Memory Clock 7008 MHz, 4GB GDDR5 128-bit
Display - VIZIO 32" E32-C1 YV @ 1080P 60Hz
Sound - Realtek High Definition Audio w/ Logitech X-540 5.1 speakers
Power Supply - 300W power supply (80+ Bronze, peak 350W)
HDD 1 - 512GB M.2 2280 NVMe™ PCIe® 4.0 SSD
HDD 2 - Western Digital WDC_WD10 1TB
Printer - Epson ET-3850
OS - Windows 11 Home x64
Top
palmboy5
Site Administrator
Posts: 7477
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

#3 Post by palmboy5 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:29 pm

You can see in
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/p6wood1.jpg
http://www.mylilsite.net/images/p60sd500/sdwood1.jpg

that the 8.1MP Nikon actually has less detail in the wood than the 7.1MP Canon. I don't think any of the Nikon pictures are making full use of 3264x2448. The effective "pixel" size is clearly larger than a real pixel.
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Misc”