AMD Processors

Talk about computer hardware here.

Moderator: victimizati0n

Message
Author
Antix
Murderer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 11:29 pm

#16 Post by Antix » Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:03 pm

You for real? They cut 64's by $100 from what they were orig?
Image

palmboy5
Site Administrator
Posts: 7477
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

#17 Post by palmboy5 » Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:13 pm

well everything sells high in the beginning.. mostly for those companies that buy them in the masses for their equiptment.
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Image

Antix
Murderer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 11:29 pm

#18 Post by Antix » Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:22 pm

What's a good mid-grade AMD processor?
Image

palmboy5
Site Administrator
Posts: 7477
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

#19 Post by palmboy5 » Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:56 pm

dunno A64 2800+?
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Image

Guest

#20 Post by Guest » Wed Aug 18, 2004 8:34 pm

A64 3000+ (best bang for buck in A64 section)
Bartlon 2500+ (best bang for buck otherwise)

Antix
Murderer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 11:29 pm

#21 Post by Antix » Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:25 am

ok. So which one for building a computer just for ripping/burning/copying DVDs & CDs? Would get OS to match. (i.e. for a 64-bit get Win 64-bit ed, 32-bit...)
Image

2005
Site Jock
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

#22 Post by 2005 » Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:40 am

Shit dawg if thats all you want to do with it.... just get a Intel P4 2.8Ghz with HT and get your self the new Pioneer DVR-108 or NEC ND 3500a, both drives are 16x DVD +/- R Burners and 4X DVD +/- RW burners and 4X DVD + DL burners... the nec is a little faster at burning cds at 48x but its dvd burning is slower and a little less in quality. Go for the pioneer if you can and just make sure you have at least 512 MB of ram and atleast 120 GB hdd. You could easily get a pc like that for under 800 bucks.
Image

Guest

#23 Post by Guest » Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:31 am

Yeah, do what 2000 said.

Anyways, you can use the A64 3000+ with Windows XP 32-bit and 64-bit. It's backward compatible.

2005
Site Jock
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

#24 Post by 2005 » Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:48 am

I7Iz490N wrote:Yeah, do what 2000 said.

Anyways, you can use the A64 3000+ with Windows XP 32-bit and 64-bit. It's backward compatible.
thats 2005 jackass
Image

Guest

#25 Post by Guest » Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:00 pm

LOL you should be happy. I was about to call you 2500+ or 2000+ LOL

Antix
Murderer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 11:29 pm

#26 Post by Antix » Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:38 pm

Yeah I know it is, but I'd rather have a 64-bit OS for a 64-bit processor... Although I guess I could wait until more programs are made for it.

Fast drives, but can you find DVD media that supports those write speeds?

I'd get at least 1GB of RAM, and and should I just get a reg. processors or one with a large cache?

Going to get a bit off topic of AMD processors here, but...


What kinda ram should I use? RDRAM (PC800, 1066), DDR (PC3200, 3700, 4000, 4400), DDR2 (PC5400)?

IF I use DDR, I'll buy OC'ed low lat. ram for gaming, because I may upgrade the computer after a while for gaming.
Image

Guest

#27 Post by Guest » Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:46 pm

Okay there...

Antix
Murderer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 11:29 pm

#28 Post by Antix » Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:05 pm

???
Image

palmboy5
Site Administrator
Posts: 7477
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

#29 Post by palmboy5 » Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:28 pm

um get the DDR.. not sure about DDR2, din know it was out actually ^^
For computers, buying cheaply and often will only leave you constantly in a world of shit.
Image

Guest

#30 Post by Guest » Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:37 pm

LOL i know, oh well atleast ur not like me.. (i was too embarrassed to say lol) damn


lolllllllllllllllll i have too much pride.. *NOT*

Post Reply