Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:30 am
by 2005
palmboy5 wrote:yeah seriously, this country is free yet not free yet too free. this country allows corporations such as McDonalds legally mess with people's minds since their birth to fatten themselves with intoxicated food. this country's corporation-controlled government allows for the companies to make money out of the children since before preschool. They allow the corporations to make shitloads of money off them without any consideration that it hurts their education.
This great country is greedy.
Well that post is somewhat distorted, keeping in mind you have no reason to "flame me" for the same reasons you think you need to flame phill.
No one put a gun to anyone's head and made them go to McDonalds or anywhere else. No one said be lazy and sit around. The truth is simply that some people (alot of people actually) have this sort of grudge aginst the states and for what I have no idea.
Obesity is a growing epidemic and its a problem but singleing us out because of our problems is a really mature thing to do isnt it???? Im sure if i wanted to dig deep enough I could find a laundry list of problems... *COUGH* Red Scare *COUGH*
Theres no point in us argueing back and forth espically since some arguments (im leaving the deciding on which ones up to the reader) are based upon no real solid information.
All i need to say is this is the kinda thing that ended BWP for us so lets just let these fights go.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:25 am
by neuralmop
This is why I'm socialist.
*diverts flame war to a different level*
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:21 am
by palmboy5
i support totalitarianism with a good leader.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 10:17 am
by philp
palmboy5 wrote:i support totalitarianism with a good leader.
Totalitarianism [n]: Absolute power, especially when exercised unjustly or cruelly.
What exactly do you mean, Palm?
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:40 am
by Q12321
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:10 pm
by Guest
lmao
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:28 pm
by palmboy5
well it said "especially" so cruelity is optional.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 5:41 pm
by neuralmop
I don't support totalitarianism, just a very minimal communistic or socialistic government. Kind of like a cross between capitalism, anarchy, and green party.
Yeah, that didn't make sense.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:45 pm
by palmboy5
mine is more flexible... it can be any of that given the "good leader" does it
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:14 pm
by neuralmop
..except Minimalistic, which is the key word.
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:59 pm
by palmboy5
mmm yes but as u said it doesnt make sense
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:47 pm
by neuralmop
Niether does totalitarianism. :b
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:50 pm
by philp
restin256 wrote:Neither does totalitarianism. :b
I agree.
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:32 pm
by palmboy5
well mainly some kinda thing where its lead by only a couple people.. with absolute power.
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:09 pm
by neuralmop
I love you, phil.
